E-mail List Archives
Re: Hiding Legends
From: James Nurthen
Date: Oct 16, 2008 6:30PM
- Next message: James Nurthen: "Re: Hiding Legends"
- Previous message: Dean Hamack: "Re: Hiding Legends"
- Next message in Thread: James Nurthen: "Re: Hiding Legends"
- Previous message in Thread: Dean Hamack: "Re: Hiding Legends"
- View all messages in this Thread
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 17:01, Dean Hamack < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>
> Obviously, the only way I'm going to be able to illustrate why you would
> want to hide legends for sighted users is with a live example. So here you
> go:
>
> http://www.bushidodesigns.net/form1.htm
>
> Yes, it looks atrocious. But I've been in this business for ten years, and
> believe me, I've seen worse looking comps from designers.
>
> I wholeheartedly agree that it's better to use text instead of images. But
> I
> can tell you from personal experience I have fought that battle with
> business people and designers before, and it's a battle you will never win.
> It might work with Joe The Plumber, but it won't work with someone like
> Amazon, Microsoft, or Facebook. Big companies care about two things -
> aesthetics, and speed. Accessibility and best practices are secondary.
>
> The above example is 100% valid XHTML, uses best practices (css image
> sprites, semantic markup, etc.), looks exactly the same on
> IE/Firefox/Safari, and degrades beautifully for print and mobile devices.
> And according to Total Valuator, it rates "Level A" Conformance to Web
> Content Accessibility Guidelines.
>
Did you test this in Windows High Contrast mode?
- Next message: James Nurthen: "Re: Hiding Legends"
- Previous message: Dean Hamack: "Re: Hiding Legends"
- Next message in Thread: James Nurthen: "Re: Hiding Legends"
- Previous message in Thread: Dean Hamack: "Re: Hiding Legends"
- View all messages in this Thread