E-mail List Archives
Re: css off
From: Jukka K. Korpela
Date: Sep 3, 2009 12:45PM
- Next message: Randall Pope: "Pagemaker or QuarkXPress and Accessible PDF Document"
- Previous message: Despain, Dallas: "Re: css off"
- Next message in Thread: Despain, Dallas: "Re: css off"
- Previous message in Thread: Despain, Dallas: "Re: css off"
- View all messages in this Thread
Despain, Dallas wrote:
> The css off rule should really be about reading order.
Why? I saw no good arguments for that. It's a very limited view on
accessibility.
> So long term perhaps we can rely on css and be accessible!
Only for odd values for "accessible".
> That was what I was trying to find out when I first asked my question
> about web2.0 dialogs and css off. I'll keep my fingers crossed.
Are you really interested in accessibility, or in complying with some
"accessibility rules" (as interpreted rather arbitrarily)?
--
Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
- Next message: Randall Pope: "Pagemaker or QuarkXPress and Accessible PDF Document"
- Previous message: Despain, Dallas: "Re: css off"
- Next message in Thread: Despain, Dallas: "Re: css off"
- Previous message in Thread: Despain, Dallas: "Re: css off"
- View all messages in this Thread