E-mail List Archives
Re: Accessibility reports of Web Conferencing products
From: J. B-Vincent
Date: Nov 24, 2009 7:55AM
- Next message: Jon Gunderson: "Re: Complex use of Radio input"
- Previous message: Moore,Michael (DARS): "Re: Accessibility reports of Web Conferencing products"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Moore,Michael (DARS): "Re: Accessibility reports of Web Conferencing products"
- View all messages in this Thread
Mike (and anyone else): do you have more information written up about the tests you did that you'd be willing to share? Thanks--Jane
--- On Tue, 11/24/09, Moore,Michael (DARS) < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
From: Moore,Michael (DARS) < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Accessibility reports of Web Conferencing products
To: "Hadi Rangin" < <EMAIL REMOVED> >, "WebAIM Discussion List" < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 6:14 AM
Thanks Hadi,
Your results confirm testing that we have done on Adobe Connect and Talking Communities. A couple of others that we have looked at: Go To Meeting, which has severe accessibility problems for keyboard users and screen reader users and Accessible Event by Serotek which looks very promising and can be run parallel to inaccessible services. When we looked at Accessible Event they had not yet implemented a voice chat feature but they had a really cool delivery mechanism for Microsoft Office Word, PPT and Excel documents. They were transmitted as accessible html. Our demo was driven from their location so I do not know what is required on the set up to support that feature.
Mike Moore
- Next message: Jon Gunderson: "Re: Complex use of Radio input"
- Previous message: Moore,Michael (DARS): "Re: Accessibility reports of Web Conferencing products"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Moore,Michael (DARS): "Re: Accessibility reports of Web Conferencing products"
- View all messages in this Thread