E-mail List Archives
Re: WCAG 2.0 Compliance criteria for internal or non public websites
From: Don Mauck
Date: Dec 8, 2009 1:06PM
- Next message: Geof Collis: "Re: WCAG 2.0 Compliance criteria for internal or non public websites"
- Previous message: Sam S: "WCAG 2.0 Compliance criteria for internal or non public websites"
- Next message in Thread: Geof Collis: "Re: WCAG 2.0 Compliance criteria for internal or non public websites"
- Previous message in Thread: Sam S: "WCAG 2.0 Compliance criteria for internal or non public websites"
- View all messages in this Thread
I'll give you my perspective. I believe that pages should always be designed and tested as though the next person that walks through that door or uses that page might be someone with a different disability than what you already have. The key is that the next person that needs this page might be that next great employee that you might let slip away if your pages can't deal with their disability. I know it's a challenge to cover all things but a page should do the very best it can to give all persons' with disabilities a chance to just maybe land that job because the pages are accessible. That's just my take.
- Next message: Geof Collis: "Re: WCAG 2.0 Compliance criteria for internal or non public websites"
- Previous message: Sam S: "WCAG 2.0 Compliance criteria for internal or non public websites"
- Next message in Thread: Geof Collis: "Re: WCAG 2.0 Compliance criteria for internal or non public websites"
- Previous message in Thread: Sam S: "WCAG 2.0 Compliance criteria for internal or non public websites"
- View all messages in this Thread