E-mail List Archives
RE: WAI needs to rethink and revisit
From: John Foliot - bytown internet
Date: May 21, 2002 5:33AM
- Next message: Lisa Halabi: "how to test for scripts"
- Previous message: Jim Thatcher: "RE: check form for accessibility?"
- Next message in Thread: Bazzmann.Com - Marco Trevisan: "Re: WAI needs to rethink and revisit"
- Previous message in Thread: Jon Gunderson: "RE: WAI needs to rethink and revisit (was Printable character between adjacent links)"
- View all messages in this Thread
Exactly my point. However, becuse the W3C's WAI Guidelines have been
"imported" lock, stock and barrel into a larger set of "Standards"
(Governement of Canada - Common Look and Feel), he is using the actual
wording to "wiggle" out of the spirit of the document. I disagree with
this, or course, which is why I am asking/urging that the wording of WCAG
2.0 be very carefully constructed. While the W3C cannot make these
guidelines "standards", other organizations can and will. I believe that
most countries in the EU are also looking at making the WAI Guidelines
government "standards" (Euro-listers? Any news?)
>
- Next message: Lisa Halabi: "how to test for scripts"
- Previous message: Jim Thatcher: "RE: check form for accessibility?"
- Next message in Thread: Bazzmann.Com - Marco Trevisan: "Re: WAI needs to rethink and revisit"
- Previous message in Thread: Jon Gunderson: "RE: WAI needs to rethink and revisit (was Printable character between adjacent links)"
- View all messages in this Thread