E-mail List Archives
Re: thoughts from Jim Thatcher re the DoJ ANPRM
From: Pratik Patel
Date: Jan 21, 2011 2:45PM
- Next message: Jared Smith: "Re: thoughts from Jim Thatcher re the DoJ ANPRM"
- Previous message: Pratik Patel: "Re: thoughts from Jim Thatcher re the DoJ ANPRM"
- Next message in Thread: Jared Smith: "Re: thoughts from Jim Thatcher re the DoJ ANPRM"
- Previous message in Thread: Pratik Patel: "Re: thoughts from Jim Thatcher re the DoJ ANPRM"
- View all messages in this Thread
Jared Smith wrote:
Now I'm not saying they shouldn't be considered for the ADA
requirements. Not meeting these Level AA success criteria can
certainly impact the user experience. But the DOJ has asked for
feedback regarding the impact these requirements might have - and
requiring Level AA by law would have a significantly higher impact
than Level A alone.
PP: yes. But, what about the negative impact of not making content
accessible? What about the years that covered entities have had to become
accessible? Let's remember that the DOJ is clarifying its rules and not
making new rules. As a consultant, I sympathize with entities who are
spending lots of money. But that doesn't mean that the floor shouldn't be
high. As I said in my previous message, entities have the undue burden
defense as they have always had. The ultimate goal should be "effective
communication" as defined by the DOJ in their latest regulations and not a
standard. Standards are the means of achiving this large goal.
Pratik
- Next message: Jared Smith: "Re: thoughts from Jim Thatcher re the DoJ ANPRM"
- Previous message: Pratik Patel: "Re: thoughts from Jim Thatcher re the DoJ ANPRM"
- Next message in Thread: Jared Smith: "Re: thoughts from Jim Thatcher re the DoJ ANPRM"
- Previous message in Thread: Pratik Patel: "Re: thoughts from Jim Thatcher re the DoJ ANPRM"
- View all messages in this Thread