E-mail List Archives
Re: Best CSS Layout for Accessibility
From: Bryan Garaventa
Date: Dec 13, 2011 3:00PM
- Next message: LSnider: "Re: Best CSS Layout for Accessibility"
- Previous message: Ryan E. Benson: "Re: Best CSS Layout for Accessibility"
- Next message in Thread: LSnider: "Re: Best CSS Layout for Accessibility"
- Previous message in Thread: Ryan E. Benson: "Re: Best CSS Layout for Accessibility"
- View all messages in this Thread
CSS has no impact on reading order from an AT standpoint. The best way to
see how it will be viewed in ATs is to disable CSS and judge whether the
reading order is sensible. The tab order will follow the same principle.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryan E. Benson" < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
To: "WebAIM Discussion List" < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 1:49 PM
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Best CSS Layout for Accessibility
> Lisa,
>
> I don't really have a suggestion about reading order. If you are
> leaning towards the content (after header), check out the Holy Grail:
> http://www.alistapart.com/articles/holygrail. It doesn't depend on
> absolute positioning.
>
> --
> Ryan E. Benson
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:34 PM, LSnider < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I need to produce an accessible website and was thinking about which css
>> layout would be best for people who use screen readers. I want to do a
>> three column css layout and wondered, where do you put the main content?
>> Is
>> it first, third, other? Webaim shows two examples of what I mean:
>>
>> http://webaim.org/techniques/css/advantage#layout
>>
>> I have been going back and forth on whether navigation or content should
>> go
>> first...I usually use skip links to help as well.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Lisa
>>
- Next message: LSnider: "Re: Best CSS Layout for Accessibility"
- Previous message: Ryan E. Benson: "Re: Best CSS Layout for Accessibility"
- Next message in Thread: LSnider: "Re: Best CSS Layout for Accessibility"
- Previous message in Thread: Ryan E. Benson: "Re: Best CSS Layout for Accessibility"
- View all messages in this Thread