E-mail List Archives
Re: Interesting effect with CSS
From: Jared Smith
Date: Jan 8, 2012 5:51AM
- Next message: Leif Halvard Silli: "Re: Interesting effect with CSS"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Interesting effect with CSS"
- Next message in Thread: Leif Halvard Silli: "Re: Interesting effect with CSS"
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Interesting effect with CSS"
- View all messages in this Thread
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 4:43 AM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
> Another way to solve this problem would be to use media queries and
> then to not send the 'content CSS' to the screenreaders. But so far,
> screenreaders have not implemented media queries, so we are out of
> luck.
As Patrick noted, there's not really a media type for screen readers.
There was a proposal for a "reader" type at one point. There currently
is a "speech" media type (formerly known as "aural"), which is for
"speech synthesizers", which I guess means screen readers. There's
also accessibility-related "braille", "embossed", and "tty".
This always brings up a bit of a heated debate - whether it's
acceptable for user agents to identify assistive technology and/or
disability. The community is generally very opposed to this
self-identification. While this seems like a good idea, I doubt that
assistive technologies are likely to start identifying themselves in a
way that would render these media types of any use.
Jared
- Next message: Leif Halvard Silli: "Re: Interesting effect with CSS"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Interesting effect with CSS"
- Next message in Thread: Leif Halvard Silli: "Re: Interesting effect with CSS"
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Interesting effect with CSS"
- View all messages in this Thread