E-mail List Archives
RE: 508 vs. WCAG
From: Steve Vosloo
Date: Aug 19, 2002 7:53AM
- Next message: tedge@tecaccess.net: "RE: Describing logos, it's just polite"
- Previous message: Diane Boettcher: "Describing logos, it's just polite"
- Next message in Thread: Cyndi Rowland: "RE: 508 vs. WCAG"
- Previous message in Thread: Jukka Korpela: "RE: 508 vs. WCAG"
- View all messages in this Thread
Thanks Jukka.
It seems that to achieve 508 compliance you'd go for Priority 1 plus a
few others from priority 2 and 3. Sounds very reasonable.
I'm still not sure if both are required, i.e. will a UK court accept
508, and a US court accept Priority 1 plus a few others from priority 2
and 3? But I suppose if it is so easy to achieve compliance for both
then an answer isn't needed. I'll just do it.
Steve
- Next message: tedge@tecaccess.net: "RE: Describing logos, it's just polite"
- Previous message: Diane Boettcher: "Describing logos, it's just polite"
- Next message in Thread: Cyndi Rowland: "RE: 508 vs. WCAG"
- Previous message in Thread: Jukka Korpela: "RE: 508 vs. WCAG"
- View all messages in this Thread