E-mail List Archives
Re: reCAPTCHA
From: Elle
Date: May 31, 2012 6:26PM
- Next message: Karl Groves: "Re: reCAPTCHA"
- Previous message: David Ashleydale: "Is WCAG a "Living" Document?"
- Next message in Thread: Karl Groves: "Re: reCAPTCHA"
- Previous message in Thread: Stella Mudd: "reCAPTCHA"
- View all messages in this Thread
Our organization uses a multilayered approach to handle security issues
with forms, none of which involve CAPTCHA (honeypot + email authentication
+ other stuff). It was a tough battle, but well worth the fight. My vote
is "noCAPTCHA" indeed.
Cheers,
Elle
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Stella Mudd < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> Summary of the link below: Some guys figured out how to crack Google's
> reCAPTCHA by audio mining the audio description used by visually impaired
> users. To thwart this new security hole, Google has made it even more
> difficult to decipher the audio description.
>
>
> http://arstechnica.com/security/2012/05/google-recaptcha-brought-to-its-knees/
>
> What can be done to stop reCAPTCHA from becoming increasingly
> inaccessible? Should we start a movement to kill reCAPTCHA? How about
> noCAPTCHA?
> > > >
--
If you want to build a ship, don't drum up the people to gather wood,
divide the work, and give orders. Instead, teach them to yearn for the vast
and endless sea.
- Antoine De Saint-Exupéry, The Little Prince
- Next message: Karl Groves: "Re: reCAPTCHA"
- Previous message: David Ashleydale: "Is WCAG a "Living" Document?"
- Next message in Thread: Karl Groves: "Re: reCAPTCHA"
- Previous message in Thread: Stella Mudd: "reCAPTCHA"
- View all messages in this Thread