E-mail List Archives
Re: NAD v. Netflix: "This is a bad ruling. Really terrible."
From: Ryan Hemphill
Date: Jun 27, 2012 9:28AM
- Next message: Ryan Hemphill: "Question about NVDA in app behaviors"
- Previous message: Karen Mardahl: "Re: NAD v. Netflix: "This is a bad ruling. Really terrible.""
- Next message in Thread: Susan Grossman: "Re: NAD v. Netflix: "This is a bad ruling. Really terrible.""
- Previous message in Thread: Karen Mardahl: "Re: NAD v. Netflix: "This is a bad ruling. Really terrible.""
- View all messages in this Thread
I read that post. That is disgusting. The fact that the title is what it
is shows an incredibly callous attitude. It's a weird situation. If that
guy saw a blind man who needed help to cross the street, he'd help - but
when he thinks about "Blind People" in the abstract, helping them is seen
as nothing but an unfair burden. The move from singular to plural seems to
create a mental gap in empathy.
There are such strange people in this world.
- Ryan
- Next message: Ryan Hemphill: "Question about NVDA in app behaviors"
- Previous message: Karen Mardahl: "Re: NAD v. Netflix: "This is a bad ruling. Really terrible.""
- Next message in Thread: Susan Grossman: "Re: NAD v. Netflix: "This is a bad ruling. Really terrible.""
- Previous message in Thread: Karen Mardahl: "Re: NAD v. Netflix: "This is a bad ruling. Really terrible.""
- View all messages in this Thread