E-mail List Archives

Re: text-only version of web pages

for

From: GF Mueden@
Date: Jan 30, 2013 10:17AM


Thank you, Whitney. I use Readability frequently, but have never tried
it while grocery shopping because the pages were so "busy".

A print friendly page is very attractive. I would like to visit one.

===gm===


On 1/30/2013 11:43 AM, Whitney Quesenbery wrote:
> I have seen users of all kinds use the "print friendly" page - usually
> simply a different stylesheet - to get a distraction-free page.
>
> There's also http://www.readability.com/ which handles many of the large
> popular sites. Web site and mobile apps available, with personalization for
> font size, column width and contrast.
>
> I've used this when I wanted to test the actual content from different
> sites and wanted to remove the confounding differences in presentation.
>
> Whitney
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Patrick H. Lauke < <EMAIL REMOVED> >wrote:
>
>> On 30/01/2013 12:17, GF Mueden@ wrote:
>>> I beg to differ. I am set to white on black for poor contrast
>>> sensitivity, 200% for poor acuity, often minimize and pull in the
>>> margins for limited visual field, and my eyes are sensitive to the glare
>>> of graphics, they blind me to any nearby copy. I would love to be able
>>> to see many sites on a text only basis. I have no objection to graphics
>>> where needed to tell the story, but I do object when it is obvious that
>>> the designer is just showing off. When ordering groceries on line, it
>>> is not necessary that the list of departments have a graphic
>>> incorporated for each department. On the other hand it does help me to
>>> recognize the product package.
>>>
>>> I am not for outlawing graphics, but please give me the choice. The
>>> ability to "X out" graphics would be appreciated.
>> But all of these issues, and how you'd like to consume content, should
>> be handled by your user agent, rather than web content authors creating
>> separate text-only/limited-graphics versions, no?
>>
>> P
>> --
>> Patrick H. Lauke
>> >> re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
>> [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
>>
>> www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
>> http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/
>> >> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
>> >> >> >> >>
>
>