E-mail List Archives
Re: ChromeVox comparison to JAWS or VoiceOver
From: Bryan Garaventa
Date: Feb 22, 2013 8:56AM
- Next message: Steve Green: "Re: ChromeVox comparison to JAWS or VoiceOver"
- Previous message: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: WebAIM-Forum Digest, Vol 95, Issue 13"
- Next message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: ChromeVox comparison to JAWS or VoiceOver"
- Previous message in Thread: Chris Rodriguez: "ChromeVox comparison to JAWS or VoiceOver"
- View all messages in this Thread
ChromeVox doesn't perform well in my experience when comparing accessibility
support in JAWS and NVDA using IE and FF, especially regarding complex
component types that require the use of ARIA. Part of this results in the
exposure of accessibility related properties and methods in Chrome itself,
so it's not just with ChromeVox, since you will see many of the same issues
when using JAWS or NVDA in Chrome.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Rodriguez" < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
To: < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 7:35 AM
Subject: [WebAIM] ChromeVox comparison to JAWS or VoiceOver
>I recently heard about ChromeVox - accessibility extensions for Chrome. It
> supposedly uses the latest web standards. If you use Chrome, would this be
> a solid option for a screen reader? How does it compare to the support of
> other software such as JAWS or VoiceOver?
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
> > >
- Next message: Steve Green: "Re: ChromeVox comparison to JAWS or VoiceOver"
- Previous message: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: WebAIM-Forum Digest, Vol 95, Issue 13"
- Next message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: ChromeVox comparison to JAWS or VoiceOver"
- Previous message in Thread: Chris Rodriguez: "ChromeVox comparison to JAWS or VoiceOver"
- View all messages in this Thread