E-mail List Archives
Re: ChromeVox comparison to JAWS or VoiceOver
From: Bryan Garaventa
Date: Feb 22, 2013 12:28PM
- Next message: EA Draffan: "Re: A question on political correctness..."
- Previous message: Jared Smith: "Re: ChromeVox comparison to JAWS or VoiceOver"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Jared Smith: "Re: ChromeVox comparison to JAWS or VoiceOver"
- View all messages in this Thread
In the past, some of our clients have assumed that testing for web
accessibility using ChromeVox means that their features are screen reader
accessible in general, which is not actually true in many cases. So if the
next logical question to this thread is 'can I test for accessibility using
ChromeVox', the answer is yes, but it doesn't mean much unless you also test
the same thing using JAWS and NVDA in IE and FF as well.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jared Smith" < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
To: "WebAIM Discussion List" < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] ChromeVox comparison to JAWS or VoiceOver
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Birkir R. Gunnarsson wrote:
>> Out of 342 responses, 2 people indicated they used Chrome Vox (and
>> then as a secondary screen reader, I think both of them).
>
> In our most recent screen reader user survey only 4 of 1782
> respondents (.2%) use Chrome as a primary screen reader. None of these
> 4 reported having a disability (probably evaluators or developers).
> Details at http://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey4/#primary
>
> Jared
> > >
- Next message: EA Draffan: "Re: A question on political correctness..."
- Previous message: Jared Smith: "Re: ChromeVox comparison to JAWS or VoiceOver"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Jared Smith: "Re: ChromeVox comparison to JAWS or VoiceOver"
- View all messages in this Thread