E-mail List Archives
Re: Native vs Embedded video
From: Steve Green
Date: Mar 7, 2013 5:02PM
- Next message: Dona Patrick: "Re: Native vs Embedded video"
- Previous message: Ryan E. Benson: "Re: Native vs Embedded video"
- Next message in Thread: Dona Patrick: "Re: Native vs Embedded video"
- Previous message in Thread: Ryan E. Benson: "Re: Native vs Embedded video"
- View all messages in this Thread
It sounds like we are in significant, if not total, agreement.
WCAG requires websites to be 'reasonably usable', not 'equally usable'. We may not like it, but that's how it's written. Therefore if we are testing for compliance with WCAG, that's the criterion we must use. If a text version passes all the success criteria (and I am not saying it would), then the website is WCAG-compliant even if it's an ugly solution.
As testers, it's not our job to justify anything - we just test against whatever criteria are applicable in the context of each project. We may encourage our clients to go further in order to improve the user experience, but they have no obligation to do so.
Steve Green
- Next message: Dona Patrick: "Re: Native vs Embedded video"
- Previous message: Ryan E. Benson: "Re: Native vs Embedded video"
- Next message in Thread: Dona Patrick: "Re: Native vs Embedded video"
- Previous message in Thread: Ryan E. Benson: "Re: Native vs Embedded video"
- View all messages in this Thread