E-mail List Archives
Re: complex layout tables
From: Patrick H. Lauke
Date: Jan 29, 2014 2:45AM
- Next message: Nathalie Sequeira: "Re: complex layout tables"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: complex layout tables"
- Next message in Thread: Nathalie Sequeira: "Re: complex layout tables"
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: complex layout tables"
- View all messages in this Thread
On 29/01/2014 02:52, Karl Groves wrote:
> Nested table layouts aren't inherently any more inaccessible than images,
> CSS, or anything really.
>
> In practice however, there are a couple of issues that tend to arise
I'd add another one:
5. It's not possible (without then resorting to heavy JavaScript) to
easily adapt a table-based layout to different screen sizes,
particularly to small windows/mobile. With CSS layouts, you have a lot
more flexibility (using media queries, rearranging some of the content,
changing floated elements to non-floated linear presentation, etc).
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
- Next message: Nathalie Sequeira: "Re: complex layout tables"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: complex layout tables"
- Next message in Thread: Nathalie Sequeira: "Re: complex layout tables"
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: complex layout tables"
- View all messages in this Thread