E-mail List Archives
Re: complex layout tables
From: Patrick H. Lauke
Date: Jan 29, 2014 2:42AM
- Next message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: complex layout tables"
- Previous message: Nathalie Sequeira: "Re: complex layout tables"
- Next message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: complex layout tables"
- Previous message in Thread: Nathalie Sequeira: "Re: complex layout tables"
- View all messages in this Thread
On 29/01/2014 07:20, Olaf Drümmer wrote:
> Hi Karl,
>
> On 29 Jan 2014, at 03:52, Karl Groves < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>
>> 2. The existence of the tables are often announced by assistive
>> technologies. So each new table gets announced, adding to unnecessarily
>> verbose output and possible user confusion.
>
> so why not introduce a rule such that AT should skip 'announcing' (does that apply to anything other than screen readers?) the table-ness of layout tables, and just progress through the layout table's cell in the intended order?
Which you CAN do using WAI ARIA role="presentation". That still leaves
you with the other problems Karl outlined. Also, building relatively
solid and well-supported layouts purely with CSS has been possible
since...oh...2001 or thereabouts. Just because you can apply a band-aid
to table-based legacy layouts to make them at least not be announced as
tables in AT is not a reason to carry on using them...
--
Patrick H. Lauke
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
- Next message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: complex layout tables"
- Previous message: Nathalie Sequeira: "Re: complex layout tables"
- Next message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: complex layout tables"
- Previous message in Thread: Nathalie Sequeira: "Re: complex layout tables"
- View all messages in this Thread