E-mail List Archives
Re: complex layout tables
From: Patrick H. Lauke
Date: Jan 29, 2014 1:04PM
- Next message: deborah.kaplan@suberic.net: "Re: complex layout tables"
- Previous message: Olaf Drümmer: "Re: complex layout tables"
- Next message in Thread: deborah.kaplan@suberic.net: "Re: complex layout tables"
- Previous message in Thread: Olaf Drümmer: "Re: complex layout tables"
- View all messages in this Thread
On 29/01/2014 20:00, Olaf Drümmer wrote:
> Now, how do you convince a user who finds layout tables highly useful
> (at least in certain use cases), believes that they work from his
> point of view (why don't mobile devices do a better job of displaying
> tabular content? It has been proven they could, but most don't), and
> has neither the expertise nor the technical means to use a CSS based
> approach for his layout table, to stop using layout tables? Will you
> send the "table police"?
You're comically blowing this out of proportion...but ok, I'll bite once
more: what do I do? Nothing. But if they come on an accessibility
mailing list and ask what's wrong with using tables for layout, I'll
tell them.
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
- Next message: deborah.kaplan@suberic.net: "Re: complex layout tables"
- Previous message: Olaf Drümmer: "Re: complex layout tables"
- Next message in Thread: deborah.kaplan@suberic.net: "Re: complex layout tables"
- Previous message in Thread: Olaf Drümmer: "Re: complex layout tables"
- View all messages in this Thread