E-mail List Archives
RE: pixels to ems - was RE: Relative vs. absolute units
From: John Foliot - bytown internet
Date: Jan 7, 2003 3:45PM
- Next message: Jared Smith: "Re[2]: pixels to ems - was RE: Relative vs. absolute units"
- Previous message: Kynn Bartlett: "Re: pixels to ems - was RE: Relative vs. absolute units"
- Next message in Thread: Jared Smith: "Re[2]: pixels to ems - was RE: Relative vs. absolute units"
- Previous message in Thread: Kynn Bartlett: "Re: pixels to ems - was RE: Relative vs. absolute units"
- View all messages in this Thread
...based on the width of the widest letter in the english alphabet, the "M"
(thus the name - although I always thought that "W" was wider...). Netscape
6/Mozilla 1 actually install with a default font size of 16 pixels, IE's
"default install" (at least on a PC, can't say for Macs) is about the same,
I beleive it's 11 pts +/-
Thus the example page on my site is never guaranteed; as a matter of fact I
state "under normal circumstances"
(http://www.bytowninternet.com/examples/relative.html). That said, icons
such as the PDF icon or text "buttons" could still stand to benefit by
scaling, especially a small icon like the acrobat icon, which is about 16px
square.
However, as always, your mileage may vary and I by no means advocate using
"ems" to size *all* images on your page(s).
JF
>
- Next message: Jared Smith: "Re[2]: pixels to ems - was RE: Relative vs. absolute units"
- Previous message: Kynn Bartlett: "Re: pixels to ems - was RE: Relative vs. absolute units"
- Next message in Thread: Jared Smith: "Re[2]: pixels to ems - was RE: Relative vs. absolute units"
- Previous message in Thread: Kynn Bartlett: "Re: pixels to ems - was RE: Relative vs. absolute units"
- View all messages in this Thread