WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Re: Video Transcript Question (Bump)

for

From: L Snider
Date: Nov 24, 2014 1:33PM

Hi Tim,

Thanks for that feedback.

So here is more information that may change the view...I will produce the
video, and it has captions, description and possibly sign language-all that
is good. Then I am also going to produce a transcript in Word. That is
going to be made into a PDF for all viewers, not just those with
disabilities. So now I am thinking about whether I just put it into
(accessible) HTML for everyone, or use (accessible) PDFs for everyone.

Converting an accessible Word doc into PDF takes no time at all (I am
making the documents straight forward, no forms, no tables, etc.), whereas
HTML will take me time as I have to convert it properly and make sure the
code is good.

I want to thank everyone for making me think, all of you have offered some
great suggestions!

Cheers

Lisa



On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Tim Harshbarger <
<EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:

> I think whether or not a downloadable transcript would be useful depends
> on the use cases.
>
> When it comes to using the transcript as an accessible alternative, I
> think there is a tendency for the user to utilize the transcript just like
> they would use the video. I do not believe that people typically download
> video for later viewing offline and so I'm uncertain someone using a
> transcript as the accessible alternative is likely to behave any
> differently.
>
> In that case, why not just use HTML for the transcript? They are already
> viewing a web page in the browser to access the video. Switching to PDF is
> going to change the user's context. They are going to have to mentally
> switch their frame of mind from navigating a web page to navigating a PDF
> document. With HTML, you can keep them in the same mental context. No
> switching gears. No swapping back and forth between using the web page and
> navigating the PDF document.
>
> I expect there are use cases where a downloadable PDF transcript would be
> useful. However, in most cases, I suspect that HTML transcripts maintain a
> slight advantage over PDF transcripts.
>
> It does sound like maybe some of this conversation might be more about
> ease of production than use cases. That is definitely a worthwhile
> consideration. How easy is it to convert the transcript from its original
> format into another format that is accessible? I have not had to convert a
> Word document to either an accessible HTML or PDF in some time, so I don't
> know what the level of effort or skill it would take to do that now.
> Depending on your video production process, you'll likely have some
> limitations on the amount of time you have to create an accessible
> transcript before the video is published. And that could potentially have
> a large impact on your format choices.
>
>