E-mail List Archives
Re: High Contrast Control Option
From: Jordan Wilson
Date: Jan 5, 2015 10:04AM
- Next message: Paul J. Adam: "Re: High Contrast Control Option"
- Previous message: Andrew Kirkpatrick: "Re: Adobe InDesign/PDF Accessibility"
- Next message in Thread: Paul J. Adam: "Re: High Contrast Control Option"
- Previous message in Thread: Karl Groves: "Re: High Contrast Control Option"
- View all messages in this Thread
Good points Karl,
What would you consider as an alternative?
We¡¯re trying to meet WCAG 2.0 A & AA, but our brand colors aren¡¯t quite
compatible.
As I see it our two options (if we want to meet the standard) are either:
1. Making the whole site contrast compatible (but not on brand)
or
2. This option where by default we have good (but not to standard)
contrast (that is on-brand) and we provide an easy option to switch to a
high contrast stylesheet that is to standard.
Option 1 was unpopular w/ the brand police, option 2 seemed to make
everyone happy.
Is there something else we should consider?
On 1/5/15, 11:22 AM, "Karl Groves" < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>Jordan,
>
>It might be worth considering for a moment who needs a feature like this.
>Low contrast is an issue for people with color vision problems and
>people with low vision. Low vision often isn't merely a case of low
>visual acuity but may rather be a manifestation of certain eye
>disease, making enhanced contrast even more important.
>
>High contrast, such as what you're suggesting, benefits those users.
>But I don't believe in site-specific assistive technology like this.
>If someone *needs* high contrast, they need it not only on your site,
>but every site they visit as well as every other application they use
>on their device.
>
>
>On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Jordan Wilson
>< <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>> We are currently planning a site and one of the options we©öve chosen to
>> implement is a High Contrast control in accordance with WCAG 2.0
>>Technique
>> G174
>>
>> This allows us some greater design/color flexibility for the site which
>>we
>> were having difficulty with because the brand colors are slightly under
>> contrast. I wanted to ask the list if they had any suggestions or
>>cautions
>> on implementing this technique.
>>
>> You can see examples of the technique at these two sites:
>> http://www.mills-peninsula.org/accessibility.html
>>
>> http://www.northeastmedicalgroup.org/
>>
>>
>> The High Contrast button is in the top right of both pages, selecting it
>> changes all CSS colors in the site to a separate high contrast version
>> (the same site, just different CSS)
>>
>> To make sure that our High Contrast option is accessible to users, we
>> thought to implement four considerations:
>>
>> 1. Ensure the switch control is a prominent, permanent and high contrast
>> element on the page.
>> 2. Place the control toward the beginning of the tab order so that
>> keyboard users will find it efficiently
>> 3. Feature the option on the site accessibility page, so that users are
>> aware of it and understand how to use it.
>> 4. Cookie the setting, so that users who enable it default to High
>> Contrast on return visits.
>>
>> Are there any opinions of users out there about implementing this
>> technique? Does anyone have experience / recommendations for
>>implementing
>> it properly?
>>
>> Here©ös the link to the WCAG description of the technique:
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20140916/G174
>>
>>
>> Thanks for you help!
>>
>> >> >> >
>
>
>--
>
>Karl Groves
>www.karlgroves.com
>@karlgroves
>http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlgroves
>Phone: +1 410.541.6829
>
>Modern Web Toolsets and Accessibility
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uq6Db47-Ks
>
>www.tenon.io
>>>
- Next message: Paul J. Adam: "Re: High Contrast Control Option"
- Previous message: Andrew Kirkpatrick: "Re: Adobe InDesign/PDF Accessibility"
- Next message in Thread: Paul J. Adam: "Re: High Contrast Control Option"
- Previous message in Thread: Karl Groves: "Re: High Contrast Control Option"
- View all messages in this Thread