E-mail List Archives
Re: Regarding Section 508 discussion
From: Andrew Kirkpatrick
Date: Feb 9, 2015 11:14AM
- Next message: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL: "Re: Regarding Section 508 discussion"
- Previous message: Olaf Drümmer: "Re: How is PDF accessibility evaluated?"
- Next message in Thread: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL: "Re: Regarding Section 508 discussion"
- Previous message in Thread: Karen Sorensen: "Regarding Section 508 discussion"
- View all messages in this Thread
I don't think that Katie is being protective of the access board so much as indicating that the _current_ source of the delay is OMB. I agree that the Access Board has not moved as quickly as possible (the TEITAC committee started its work in 2006) and certainly agree that when there is a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that people should feel free to comment on it.
If you're interested in getting the new 508 moving I suspect that it wouldn't hurt to have your legislators inquire with the OMB.
Next update comes at the next board meeting: http://www.access-board.gov/board-meetings/eventdetail/26/-/board-meeting
AWK
- Next message: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL: "Re: Regarding Section 508 discussion"
- Previous message: Olaf Drümmer: "Re: How is PDF accessibility evaluated?"
- Next message in Thread: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL: "Re: Regarding Section 508 discussion"
- Previous message in Thread: Karen Sorensen: "Regarding Section 508 discussion"
- View all messages in this Thread