E-mail List Archives
Can HTML tagged content conform to WCAG 2.0 without <body>, etc?
From: Duff Johnson
Date: Apr 21, 2015 10:21AM
- Next message: Andrew Kirkpatrick: "Re: Can HTML tagged content conform to WCAG 2.0 without , etc?"
- Previous message: Nasrin.Saef@dimdi.de: "Re: Keyboard accessibility of abbreviations"
- Next message in Thread: Andrew Kirkpatrick: "Re: Can HTML tagged content conform to WCAG 2.0 without , etc?"
- Previous message in Thread: None
- View all messages in this Thread
Question for the WAI / HTML gurus=E2=80=A6
Imagine a .html file including only the following content:
<p>Some text</p>
(I=E2=80=99ve attached such a file in the hope that the server may allow =
it to the list)
To be clear.. this file does *not* include <doctype, <body>, etc. If it =
doesn=E2=80=99t comply with WCAG; why not?
Thanks,
Duff.
- Next message: Andrew Kirkpatrick: "Re: Can HTML tagged content conform to WCAG 2.0 without , etc?"
- Previous message: Nasrin.Saef@dimdi.de: "Re: Keyboard accessibility of abbreviations"
- Next message in Thread: Andrew Kirkpatrick: "Re: Can HTML tagged content conform to WCAG 2.0 without , etc?"
- Previous message in Thread: None
- View all messages in this Thread