E-mail List Archives
Re: Can HTML tagged content conform to WCAG 2.0 without <body>, etc?
From: Andrew Kirkpatrick
Date: Apr 21, 2015 10:33AM
- Next message: Duff Johnson: "Re: Can HTML tagged content conform to WCAG 2.0 without , etc?"
- Previous message: Duff Johnson: "Can HTML tagged content conform to WCAG 2.0 without , etc?"
- Next message in Thread: Duff Johnson: "Re: Can HTML tagged content conform to WCAG 2.0 without , etc?"
- Previous message in Thread: Duff Johnson: "Can HTML tagged content conform to WCAG 2.0 without , etc?"
- View all messages in this Thread
It isn't best practice for HTML development but I'd say that while the file meets most success criteria it would fail 2.4.2 (Page titled) as the HTML element needed to provide a title is absent.
HTML5 allows the body element to be omitted in some circumstances, and this file would be one such example.
AWK
- Next message: Duff Johnson: "Re: Can HTML tagged content conform to WCAG 2.0 without , etc?"
- Previous message: Duff Johnson: "Can HTML tagged content conform to WCAG 2.0 without , etc?"
- Next message in Thread: Duff Johnson: "Re: Can HTML tagged content conform to WCAG 2.0 without , etc?"
- Previous message in Thread: Duff Johnson: "Can HTML tagged content conform to WCAG 2.0 without , etc?"
- View all messages in this Thread