E-mail List Archives
Re: Tiny clickable element: does this fail WCAG2?
From: Lynn Holdsworth
Date: Jul 20, 2015 10:51AM
- Next message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Where does invisible link text fail WCAG2?"
- Previous message: Chagnon | PubCom: "Re: Tiny clickable element: does this fail WCAG2?"
- Next message in Thread: chaals@yandex-team.ru: "Re: Tiny clickable element: does this fail WCAG2?"
- Previous message in Thread: Chagnon | PubCom: "Re: Tiny clickable element: does this fail WCAG2?"
- View all messages in this Thread
Hi Bevi,
I'll give this a read. Thanks for flagging it up.
KR, Lyn
On 20/07/2015, Chagnon | PubCom < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> Coincidentally, Jakob Nielsen's group published today an article about some
> common UX features in iOS that impair usability. One of those design items
> was the use of dots to represent different pages, or in your case, different
> views in the carousel.
>
> Although they focus on usability, a close cousin of accessibility, the
> article is worth reading:
> http://www.nngroup.com/articles/4-ios-rules-break/
>
> --Bevi Chagnon
>
>
- Next message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Where does invisible link text fail WCAG2?"
- Previous message: Chagnon | PubCom: "Re: Tiny clickable element: does this fail WCAG2?"
- Next message in Thread: chaals@yandex-team.ru: "Re: Tiny clickable element: does this fail WCAG2?"
- Previous message in Thread: Chagnon | PubCom: "Re: Tiny clickable element: does this fail WCAG2?"
- View all messages in this Thread