E-mail List Archives
Re: Tiny clickable element: does this fail WCAG2?
From: chaals
Date: Jul 20, 2015 5:03PM
- Next message: chaals@yandex-team.ru: "Re: Where does invisible link text fail WCAG2?"
- Previous message: Paul J. Adam: "Re: JAWS 14 issues with partial view reloads for Single Page Java web applications"
- Next message in Thread: Subhash Chhetri: "Re: Tiny clickable element: does this fail WCAG2?"
- Previous message in Thread: Lynn Holdsworth: "Re: Tiny clickable element: does this fail WCAG2?"
- View all messages in this Thread
- lynn.holdsworth@
Hi all,
20.07.2015, 18:31, "Lynn Holdsworth" < <EMAIL REMOVED> >:
> Hi Deborah,
>
> This could be viewed as usability, except it would affect people with
> poor vision or unsteady hands more than your average bear.
If the things you have to identify are not readily visually identifiable, it might fail under requirements for contrast. I think there is a bug here in WCAG that should be fixed, requiring controls to be operable.
Many carousels also technically fail on timing requirements.
> But I'm not sure where to fail it.
>
> I don't know anybody who likes carousels :-)
I don't hate them as much as most people. Although I wish we had the tabpanels spec implemented, and people could easily reset the presentation to be a well-behaved panelset under simple user control :)
cheers
--
Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
<EMAIL REMOVED> - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
- Next message: chaals@yandex-team.ru: "Re: Where does invisible link text fail WCAG2?"
- Previous message: Paul J. Adam: "Re: JAWS 14 issues with partial view reloads for Single Page Java web applications"
- Next message in Thread: Subhash Chhetri: "Re: Tiny clickable element: does this fail WCAG2?"
- Previous message in Thread: Lynn Holdsworth: "Re: Tiny clickable element: does this fail WCAG2?"
- View all messages in this Thread