E-mail List Archives
Re: Where does invisible link text fail WCAG2?
From: chaals
Date: Jul 20, 2015 5:06PM
- Next message: Mary Elizabeth Sullivan: "Re: JAWS 14 issues with partial view reloads for Single Page Java web applications"
- Previous message: chaals@yandex-team.ru: "Re: Tiny clickable element: does this fail WCAG2?"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Where does invisible link text fail WCAG2?"
- View all messages in this Thread
- lynn.holdsworth@
20.07.2015, 18:28, "Lynn Holdsworth" < <EMAIL REMOVED> >:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Thanks for those useful suggestions.
>
> I can't really fail it on contrast, because it's been resized to 1px
> to make it invisible so there's no contrast to test.
Zero contrast sounds like there is insufficient contrast to me…
The requirement is that users can determine that it is there. I don't think there is anything in WCAG that makes it clear, but "sufficient contrast to be perceivable" generally requires being a certain size as well as colour combination.
Has anyone here filed a bug on WCAG or its associated documents for this issue? I think that would be a useful thing to do - so if the answer is no, I'll do it.
> But yes, I should be able to fail it under keyboard operable.
>
> Cheers, Lynn
>
--
Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
<EMAIL REMOVED> - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
- Next message: Mary Elizabeth Sullivan: "Re: JAWS 14 issues with partial view reloads for Single Page Java web applications"
- Previous message: chaals@yandex-team.ru: "Re: Tiny clickable element: does this fail WCAG2?"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Where does invisible link text fail WCAG2?"
- View all messages in this Thread