E-mail List Archives
Re: PDF Container tags
From: Andrew Kirkpatrick
Date: Sep 29, 2015 8:09AM
- Next message: Duff Johnson: "Re: PDF Container tags"
- Previous message: Jon Metz: "Re: PDF Container tags"
- Next message in Thread: Duff Johnson: "Re: PDF Container tags"
- Previous message in Thread: Jon Metz: "Re: PDF Container tags"
- View all messages in this Thread
Bevi,
At least with Adobe Reader, Part, Article, Section, Division, and Document tags are exposed for assistive technology to have access to. I do not believe that any AT does anything with this information currently, but that isn't to say that they couldn't.
Thanks,
AWK
Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe Systems
<EMAIL REMOVED>
http://twitter.com/awkawk
http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility
On 9/28/15, 22:29, "WebAIM-Forum on behalf of Chagnon | PubCom.com" < <EMAIL REMOVED> on behalf of <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>Thanks Ryan. You're confirming my opinion.
>And thanks for catching <Document> rather than <DOC>. Sometimes I get my various tagging languages/syntax flipped.
>
>But to clarify my earlier question:
>Do these various container tags -- <DOCUMENT>, <PART>, <ART>, <SECT>, and <DIV> -- have any affect on screen readers and other AT?
>
>They are the container tags specified in the PDF 2008 standard tag set. In my experience, we haven't noticed any screen readers acknowledging them in a document, nor stumbling over them either.
>
>Do they cause problems for AT?
>Do they provide any benefits for AT users?
>
>--Bevi Chagnon
>
>
- Next message: Duff Johnson: "Re: PDF Container tags"
- Previous message: Jon Metz: "Re: PDF Container tags"
- Next message in Thread: Duff Johnson: "Re: PDF Container tags"
- Previous message in Thread: Jon Metz: "Re: PDF Container tags"
- View all messages in this Thread