E-mail List Archives
Re: longdesc or aria-describedby for infographic
From: Chaals McCathie Nevile
Date: Nov 23, 2015 7:30PM
- Next message: Moore,Michael (Accessibility) (HHSC): "Re: longdesc or aria-describedby for infographic"
- Previous message: deborah.kaplan@suberic.net: "Re: longdesc or aria-describedby for infographic"
- Next message in Thread: Moore,Michael (Accessibility) (HHSC): "Re: longdesc or aria-describedby for infographic"
- Previous message in Thread: deborah.kaplan@suberic.net: "Re: longdesc or aria-describedby for infographic"
- View all messages in this Thread
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 12:38:02 +1100, < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> I'd suggest longdesc (with, if you can get away with it, a visible
> standard link as well for the poor suckers on webkit browsers).
As well as those of us who aren't using a screenreader, haven't got a
decent longdesc extension, but can't *clearly* see the image, or can't
readily understand what it means.
> This is not because longdesc support is great -- it isn't:
(It's pretty good in screenreaders other than VoiceOver, and woeful
otherwise without browser extensions ;( ).
> http://webaim.org/techniques/alttext/longdesctestcases.htm -- but
> because aria-describedby is not announced as a skippable long
> description, and will just read through the whole thing like any in page
> text.
And pretty much isn't available to people who don't use screenreaders. So
moving stuff off-screen is a pretty bad answer for lots of different
people, for a couple of different reasons.
> 2300 characters seems like a lot to listen to without announced
> skippability.
>
> Alternately, if you do use describedby, you could:
>
> 1. Give it some header text and a "skip to end" link.
> 2. Make it visually focusable for VI users who don't use screen readers,
> via a visible link that brings the text on screen.
Yeah… that's an approach.
cheers
Chaals
> Deborah
>
>
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015, Angela French wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> I have an infographic and have been provided a description for it that
>> is 2313 characters long. I'm wondering whether to use <img
>> longdesc="description...." /> or use aria-describedby and position it
>> off page.
>>
>> Can anyone advise me as to what is the most preferred by users of
>> screen readers?
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>> Angela French
>> Internet Specialist
>> Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges
>> 360-704-4316
>> <EMAIL REMOVED> <mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> >
>> www.checkoutacollege.com<http://www.checkoutacollege.com/>
>> www.sbctc.edu<http://www.sbctc.edu/>
>>
>> >> >> >> >
--
Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
<EMAIL REMOVED> - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
- Next message: Moore,Michael (Accessibility) (HHSC): "Re: longdesc or aria-describedby for infographic"
- Previous message: deborah.kaplan@suberic.net: "Re: longdesc or aria-describedby for infographic"
- Next message in Thread: Moore,Michael (Accessibility) (HHSC): "Re: longdesc or aria-describedby for infographic"
- Previous message in Thread: deborah.kaplan@suberic.net: "Re: longdesc or aria-describedby for infographic"
- View all messages in this Thread