E-mail List Archives
Re: WCAG criterion failed when content can be read screen reader, when it shouldn't be?
From: Patrick H. Lauke
Date: Dec 18, 2015 8:37AM
- Next message: Moore,Michael (Accessibility) (HHSC): "Re: WCAG criterion failed when content can be read screen reader, when it shouldn't be?"
- Previous message: Robert Fentress: "Re: WCAG criterion failed when content can be read screen reader, when it shouldn't be?"
- Next message in Thread: Moore,Michael (Accessibility) (HHSC): "Re: WCAG criterion failed when content can be read screen reader, when it shouldn't be?"
- Previous message in Thread: Robert Fentress: "Re: WCAG criterion failed when content can be read screen reader, when it shouldn't be?"
- View all messages in this Thread
On 18/12/2015 15:29, Robert Fentress wrote:
> I tend to agree. I guess 4.1.2 would fail, since the aria-hidden property
> is not set properly, but it seems like a bit of a stretch, for some reason.
I'd tend more towards 1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence, as 4.1.2 refers to
"user interface components"; then again, if we're talking about a modal
dialog, that would certainly be a user interface component - but if it's
just some text that gets shown/hidden somehow, I wouldn't necessarily
call it that...
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
- Next message: Moore,Michael (Accessibility) (HHSC): "Re: WCAG criterion failed when content can be read screen reader, when it shouldn't be?"
- Previous message: Robert Fentress: "Re: WCAG criterion failed when content can be read screen reader, when it shouldn't be?"
- Next message in Thread: Moore,Michael (Accessibility) (HHSC): "Re: WCAG criterion failed when content can be read screen reader, when it shouldn't be?"
- Previous message in Thread: Robert Fentress: "Re: WCAG criterion failed when content can be read screen reader, when it shouldn't be?"
- View all messages in this Thread