E-mail List Archives
Re: using "label for=" on things other than inputs
From: Detlev Fischer
Date: Feb 20, 2016 5:42AM
- Next message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: using "label for=" on things other than inputs"
- Previous message: Steve Faulkner: "Re: using "label for=" on things other than inputs"
- Next message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: using "label for=" on things other than inputs"
- Previous message in Thread: Steve Faulkner: "Re: using "label for=" on things other than inputs"
- View all messages in this Thread
All this doesn't quite answer my original question whether the use of label on elements other than those Steve listed could be confusing and should be discouraged. I take it nobody would see a failure of 1.3.1 for using 'label for=' on read-only text, disabled input, or a button that already has an accessible name via value - correct?
Sent from phone
> On 20 Feb 2016, at 09:37, Steve Faulkner < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>
> On 20 February 2016 at 01:42, Jonathan Avila < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
> wrote:
>
>> HTML Accessibility API Mappings 1.0<
>> https://www.w3.org/TR/html-aam-1.0/#button-element> also indicates the
>> following which does not seem to include the label element:
>
> Yes you are correct that this is was the API spec currently says, that is
> my fault.
>
> I have filed an issue https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/259
>
> --
>
> Regards
>
> SteveF
> Current Standards Work @W3C
> <http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/>
> > > >
- Next message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: using "label for=" on things other than inputs"
- Previous message: Steve Faulkner: "Re: using "label for=" on things other than inputs"
- Next message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: using "label for=" on things other than inputs"
- Previous message in Thread: Steve Faulkner: "Re: using "label for=" on things other than inputs"
- View all messages in this Thread