E-mail List Archives
Re: WCAG Violation for use of tabindex=0 on staticelements.
From: Moore,Michael (Accessibility) (HHSC)
Date: Mar 16, 2016 3:30PM
- Next message: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: WCAG Violation for use of tabindex=0 on static elements."
- Previous message: Lucy Greco: "Re: WCAG Violation for use of tabindex=0 on static elements."
- Next message in Thread: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: WCAG Violation for use of tabindex=0 on static elements."
- Previous message in Thread: Lucy Greco: "Re: WCAG Violation for use of tabindex=0 on static elements."
- View all messages in this Thread
"Any accessibility effort that is so reliant upon WCAG that it neglects to address end user issues that are not defined as WCAG failures will rarely result in good accessibility."
I totally agree but am going for the stretch argument anyway. Otherwise it probably will not be fixed.
Mike Moore
Accessibility Coordinator
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Civil Rights Office
- Next message: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: WCAG Violation for use of tabindex=0 on static elements."
- Previous message: Lucy Greco: "Re: WCAG Violation for use of tabindex=0 on static elements."
- Next message in Thread: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: WCAG Violation for use of tabindex=0 on static elements."
- Previous message in Thread: Lucy Greco: "Re: WCAG Violation for use of tabindex=0 on static elements."
- View all messages in this Thread