E-mail List Archives
Re: WCAG Violation for use of tabindex=0 on static elements.
From: Kevin Prince
Date: Mar 17, 2016 1:04PM
- Next message: L Snider: "Re: Surveys for a CSUN presentation (plase take them if you can)"
- Previous message: Don Mauck: "Re: Surveys for a CSUN presentation (plase take them if you can)"
- Next message in Thread: Maxability Accessibility for all: "Re: WCAG Violation for use of tabindex=0 on static elements."
- Previous message in Thread: Guy Hickling: "Re: WCAG Violation for use of tabindex=0 on static elements."
- View all messages in this Thread
Thanks for this discussion. I have had to use precisely this hack to expose helper text in a form where the backend doesn't allow for aria or for html to attach the helper text to the field. I'd argue that, in my case, these are actionable - they are elements of the form that you need to read to complete it, the focus is correctly indicated and it's the lesser of two evils. Having 3 tabstops for a heading isn't logical though so fails for me without any stretch of WCAG.
Kev
Access1in5
0212220638
039290692
Independent Accessibility and IT Consultancy.
> On 18/03/2016, at 02:55, Andrew Kirkpatrick < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>
> This is definitely an area that I'd like to see clarified in the future. I would argue that text _is_ a user interface component, and if you have:
>
> <p tabindex=0>Some text</p>
>
> You have set the name and role by using a paragraph and by the paragraph having the text content. The browser may report the element as clickable (the state), so some of these concerns may actually be addressed. Of course there are accessibility support issues, but we will put that aside for now.
>
> The questions that I have about this type of interaction (apart from "is this really necessary?") are:
> Will a screen reader user know that this is a link or provides some other interaction and if so, know how to activate it and what it is for? (perhaps 2.4.4 if the effect is that a link is created, or 1.1.1 to make sure that the control has a name that describes the input, 4.1.2 just requires a name - 1.1.1 requires that it describes the purpose)
>
> Will a sighted keyboard user be able to know that this control is interactive and how to use it? (SC 2.4.7 for focus visibility. The how to use it is likely a question that will affect all users)
>
> So I would say that 1.1.1 and 2.4.7 are SC that I'd look at for this.
>
> Thanks,
> AWK
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
> Adobe
>
> <EMAIL REMOVED>
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
> http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 3/16/16, 20:30, "WebAIM-Forum on behalf of Jonathan Avila" < <EMAIL REMOVED> on behalf of <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>
>>> Adding tabindex=0 makes it a User Interface Component so 4.1.2 now applies to these traditionally non-widget components
>>
>> This brings up a question I have always wondered -- what role can you apply to text? None? Presentation? There are some rare situations where you may want to place text in the focus order and if you do -- what role would you be required to use in order for it to meet SC 4.1.2?
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>>
- Next message: L Snider: "Re: Surveys for a CSUN presentation (plase take them if you can)"
- Previous message: Don Mauck: "Re: Surveys for a CSUN presentation (plase take them if you can)"
- Next message in Thread: Maxability Accessibility for all: "Re: WCAG Violation for use of tabindex=0 on static elements."
- Previous message in Thread: Guy Hickling: "Re: WCAG Violation for use of tabindex=0 on static elements."
- View all messages in this Thread