E-mail List Archives
Re: Empty UL tags
From: Jukka K. Korpela
Date: May 23, 2003 9:55AM
- Next message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: fieldset for radio buttons"
- Previous message: Rachel: "Empty UL tags"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Rachel: "Empty UL tags"
- View all messages in this Thread
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Rachel wrote:
> My question is: will assistive technologies have
> trouble with empty, nested UL tags?
Maybe. But a UL element (sic) with empty content is syntactically invalid,
so all bets are off anyway. You should not generate such constructs, since
they violate the formal requirement that a UL element contain one or more
LI elements.
--
Jukka "Yucca" Korpela, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
- Next message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: fieldset for radio buttons"
- Previous message: Rachel: "Empty UL tags"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Rachel: "Empty UL tags"
- View all messages in this Thread