E-mail List Archives

Re: Empty UL tags

for

From: Jukka K. Korpela
Date: May 23, 2003 9:55AM


On Fri, 23 May 2003, Rachel wrote:

> My question is: will assistive technologies have
> trouble with empty, nested UL tags?

Maybe. But a UL element (sic) with empty content is syntactically invalid,
so all bets are off anyway. You should not generate such constructs, since
they violate the formal requirement that a UL element contain one or more
LI elements.

--
Jukka "Yucca" Korpela, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/


----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/