E-mail List Archives
Re: Alt Tags length and Content
From: Jukka K. Korpela
Date: Aug 5, 2003 10:31PM
- Next message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Alt Tags length and Content"
- Previous message: Jericho: "Alt Tags length and Content"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Jericho: "Alt Tags length and Content"
- View all messages in this Thread
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Jericho wrote:
> I have noticed that some web sites that use graphical text buttons use alt
> text that is very wordy, like "This link will take you to our contacts page
> where you can find our email address and phone number", for a button that
> simply says CONTACT US.
That's bad practice. The wordy text could be appropriate as a TITLE
attribute value, not ALT attribute value.
By the way, if it's really a button, that's poor usability and has some
accessibility impact too. It should be a link, and look like a link.
> Is there some common standard on this?
The definition of the ALT attribute is that it specifies a textual
_replacement_ for an image. Although this definition has been obscured by
calling it a "description" at other places, Guideline 1 in WAI
recommendations is "Provide equivalent alternatives to auditory and visual
content." In the given case, "Contact us" s a textual replacement, i.e.
equivalent alternative, whereas the wordy text is not.
--
Jukka "Yucca" Korpela, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
- Next message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Alt Tags length and Content"
- Previous message: Jericho: "Alt Tags length and Content"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Jericho: "Alt Tags length and Content"
- View all messages in this Thread