E-mail List Archives
Re: Wcag 2.1
From: Jonathan Avila
Date: May 11, 2017 8:36AM
- Next message: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Wcag 2.1"
- Previous message: John Foliot: "Re: Wcag 2.1"
- Next message in Thread: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Wcag 2.1"
- Previous message in Thread: John Foliot: "Re: Wcag 2.1"
- View all messages in this Thread
> My understanding of WCAG 2.1 is that the new requirements )low vision, cognitive, mobile) success criteria will be optional (I think you can choose to comply with 1 or more of those), though I am not overly clear on the details.
That is not correct. Originally mobile, cognitive, low vision were seen as extensions. However, that approach did not seem to be equitable with the community. Now the work from the task forces is going to be rolled in a WCAG 2.1 without extensions. In order to meet 2.1 at a particular level you will need to conform to all of the criteria at that level. What criteria are in or out is still fluid. Mobile technology is not really a specific area anymore as the reality is really that some people have smaller screens or touch devices but others have touch screens on larger devices. Thus criteria will focus on the capabilities of the content.
Jonathan
Jonathan Avila
Chief Accessibility Officer
SSB BART GroupÂÂ
<EMAIL REMOVED>
703.637.8957 (Office)
Visit us online: Website | Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn | Blog
Download our CSUN Presentations Here!
The information contained in this transmission may be attorney privileged and/or confidential information intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
- Next message: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Wcag 2.1"
- Previous message: John Foliot: "Re: Wcag 2.1"
- Next message in Thread: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Wcag 2.1"
- Previous message in Thread: John Foliot: "Re: Wcag 2.1"
- View all messages in this Thread