E-mail List Archives
Re: Wcag 2.1
From: Birkir R. Gunnarsson
Date: May 11, 2017 8:41AM
- Next message: John Contarino x245: "Web development; How to identify if a screen reader is in use"
- Previous message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Wcag 2.1"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Wcag 2.1"
- View all messages in this Thread
Thanks John and Jon for the updates and corrections.
Since I moved over from consulting to running a corporate program I
don´t always follow all the latest developments as much as I should.
I have carefully studied all the WCAG 2.1 success criteria. I am
excited by some, baffled by others, but I was not sure what the
compliance requirements were, I hadn't gotten there yet.
I love having acces to guys like Jon and John, and to this list, for
keeping me up-to-date.
On 5/11/17, Jonathan Avila < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>> My understanding of WCAG 2.1 is that the new requirements )low vision,
>> cognitive, mobile) success criteria will be optional (I think you can
>> choose to comply with 1 or more of those), though I am not overly clear on
>> the details.
>
> That is not correct. Originally mobile, cognitive, low vision were seen as
> extensions. However, that approach did not seem to be equitable with the
> community. Now the work from the task forces is going to be rolled in a
> WCAG 2.1 without extensions. In order to meet 2.1 at a particular level you
> will need to conform to all of the criteria at that level. What criteria
> are in or out is still fluid. Mobile technology is not really a specific
> area anymore as the reality is really that some people have smaller screens
> or touch devices but others have touch screens on larger devices. Thus
> criteria will focus on the capabilities of the content.
>
> Jonathan
>
> Jonathan Avila
> Chief Accessibility Officer
> SSB BART Group
> <EMAIL REMOVED>
> 703.637.8957 (Office)
> Visit us online: Website | Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn | Blog
> Download our CSUN Presentations Here!
>
> The information contained in this transmission may be attorney privileged
> and/or confidential information intended for the use of the individual or
> entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution
> or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
>
>
>
- Next message: John Contarino x245: "Web development; How to identify if a screen reader is in use"
- Previous message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Wcag 2.1"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Wcag 2.1"
- View all messages in this Thread