WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Re: SC 1.2.2 and YouTube's auto captions

for

From: John Foliot
Date: Jun 27, 2017 3:28PM

> By my interpretation, if the captions don't allow the user to understand
the media content or don't convey the content of the spoken dialogue and
non-dialogue audio, then they would not be conformant.

I don't think Jared and I are far apart (we usually aren't), and I don't
disagree with his interpretation.

The larger issue however is that we don't have a legally defined
interpretation, which means we have to rely on logic and intuition, and our
understanding of the problem space. That's relatively easy for us as SME's
(beginner or experienced - if you are reading this I will call you a
Subject Matter Expert).

My only point is that there are many ways to look at this: legally,
practically, and holistically, and each perspective will likely land you at
a different response. I'm simply suggesting that one legal interpretation
of the actual Success Criteria would not include 'accuracy' as one of the
requirements, at least not explicitly, because that term and concept is not
mentioned in the normative Success Criteria. That's not great, but it is
accurate.

JF

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Angela French < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:

> Maybe this would be a smart aleck answer for them but ask them if html
> pages with misspelled text all over them is okay? I suspect the answer
> would be no.
>
> Angela French
> SBCTC
>
>