E-mail List Archives
Re: Section 508 Standards Compliance and Scripts
From: Anitra Pavka
Date: Sep 4, 2003 2:48PM
- Next message: Jon Gunderson: "RE: Section 508 Standards Compliance and Scripts"
- Previous message: Karl Groves: "RE: Section 508 Standards Compliance and Scripts"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: julian.rickards@ndm.gov.on.ca: "RE: Section 508 Standards Compliance and Scripts"
- View all messages in this Thread
<EMAIL REMOVED> wrote:
>Section 508 is based on WAI but scattered a bit in terms of Priority levels.
>With regard to the JavaScript question, I believe that WAI is a bit more
>strict and would be more likely to reject some claims of compliance as
>compared with Section 508. If you can achieve compliance with WAI Priority
>2, you will be in good standing for Section 508.
>
There is one notable exception to the belief that WAI Priority 2's
encapsulate all Section 508 Web guidelines. Section 508 guideline
1194.22 (p) is not reflected in WAI's WCAG 1.0.
http://www.access-board.gov/sec508/guide/1194.22.htm#(p)
The closest WCAG 1.0 comes to covering it is Guideline 7, but none of
the related checkpoints specifically address the user's ability to
extend time limits.
http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/#gl-movement
Fortunately, the WCAG 2.0 (current) Draft explicitly covers the missing
guideline.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-WCAG20-20030624/#time-limits
- Anitra Pavka
Web Developer, www.accesskansas.org
Web Accessibility Advocate, www.anitrapavka.com
>>
- Next message: Jon Gunderson: "RE: Section 508 Standards Compliance and Scripts"
- Previous message: Karl Groves: "RE: Section 508 Standards Compliance and Scripts"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: julian.rickards@ndm.gov.on.ca: "RE: Section 508 Standards Compliance and Scripts"
- View all messages in this Thread