WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

RE: Section 508 Standards Compliance and Scripts

for

From: julian.rickards@ndm.gov.on.ca
Date: Sep 4, 2003 1:22PM

Section 508 is based on WAI but scattered a bit in terms of Priority levels.
With regard to the JavaScript question, I believe that WAI is a bit more
strict and would be more likely to reject some claims of compliance as
compared with Section 508. If you can achieve compliance with WAI Priority
2, you will be in good standing for Section 508.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: <EMAIL REMOVED> [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ]
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 2:16 PM
> To: <EMAIL REMOVED>
> Subject: RE: Section 508 Standards Compliance and Scripts
>
>
> [from my previous post under this subject]
> "KYVU currently uses a CMS that makes a similar claim about
> its product
> ("content written to the screen before the page loads"). Disabling
> JavaScript while using that platform makes course material
> inaccessible.
> All an end user receives is a one sentence message stating
> that the page
> won't work w/ JavaScript disabled, and no other means to
> access the course
> is provided. How can this be considered compliance...???"
>
> Thanks to all for the very useful feedback to date.
>
> But...how about this question, but in regards to WCAG 1.0,
> priority 1. This
> is the standard to which the Commonwealth of Kentucky is
> probably going to
> hold their sites accountable. Would a course management
> system that did not
> display course material when JavaScript was disabled be considered
> compliant?
>
> Bryce Fields
> Web Developer
> Kentucky Virtual University
> http://www.kyvu.org/
>
> 1-877-740-4357
> 1-502-573-1555 ext 288
>
> "Do or do not. There is no try." -- Yoda
>
>
>
> ----
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, suspend, or view list archives,
> visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
>


----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, suspend, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/