E-mail List Archives
Re: Fourth rule of aria > aria-hidden
From: Patrick H. Lauke
Date: Jan 22, 2018 5:46AM
- Next message: Steve Faulkner: "Re: Fourth rule of aria > aria-hidden"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Fourth rule of aria > aria-hidden"
- Next message in Thread: Steve Faulkner: "Re: Fourth rule of aria > aria-hidden"
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Fourth rule of aria > aria-hidden"
- View all messages in this Thread
On 22/01/2018 12:45, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
> The rule, in essence, says: you don't want an AT user setting focus to
> "nothing", as they're left wondering what they just set focus to. If
> it's aria-hidden (or contained inside an aria-hidden container), but
> received focus, it's an empty step in the focus cycle.
>
> Nobody dies when this happens, to be clear. And the "rules" of using
> ARIA are more good practice maxims, not hard failures.
>
> IF you can justify why something still receives keyboard focus but isn't
> announced at all to AT users, cool.
At that point, you may even consider adding some SR only text to the
page that explains what's going on, before the user encounters those
"focusable but unannounced" controls, mind.
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
- Next message: Steve Faulkner: "Re: Fourth rule of aria > aria-hidden"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Fourth rule of aria > aria-hidden"
- Next message in Thread: Steve Faulkner: "Re: Fourth rule of aria > aria-hidden"
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Fourth rule of aria > aria-hidden"
- View all messages in this Thread