E-mail List Archives
Re: To what degree does failure to convey structure violate 1.3.1 or other success criteria?
From: Jim Allan
Date: Feb 14, 2018 9:18AM
- Next message: Angela French: "labeling sections"
- Previous message: Lovely, Brian: "Re: Few web accessibility related vialations:"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Bourne, Sarah (MASSIT): "Re: To what degree does failure to convey structure violate 1.3.1 or other success criteria?"
- View all messages in this Thread
Sarah,
Those "tiles" function as links and are marked up as links. That's
semantic. It would be useful to make them a list so the user would know -
How many Top Tasks there are, or How many things do I need to know. Links
in a list would be more useful semantics. They could still look like
"tiles". You could add some aria roles (list, list item) to add list
semantics.
I wish the ones that open pdf document would tell me that.
Jim
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 2:48 PM, Bourne, Sarah (MASSIT) <
<EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> Going back to Bob's original set of questions, what if you aren't really
> sure what structure is being conveyed by the presentation?
>
> For example, I'm looking at the " Find Your Future Commonwealth Job" page
> on Mass.gov [1]. Two H2s, " What would you like to do?" and " What you
> need to know". Each of these has very attractive "tiles" with links to
> more specific information. Right now, these tiles have no semantic markup
> other than the A tag. You may have noticed that there is no "tile" tag in
> HTML. <smile> Visually, I would think they're most like paragraphs and
> should use the P tag. Functionally, I would think list mark-up would be
> more useful, for screen reader users anyway.
>
> So, two questions here: Is this a violation of 1.3.1?, and What is the
> correct structural markup?
>
> The next H2 (which looks different, by the way) is "Additional Resources"
> followed by text links (no tiles). Again, they are only marked up with
> DIVs. Surely they should be list items (even though they look more like
> paragraphs.) But is it a 1.3.1 failure that they aren't marked up as
> either a list or a paragraph? The last link takes you to another pages
> showing all additional resources [2] with the same problem.
>
> Things like this are what make feel uncomfortable basing conformance just
> on what something looks like. If your H2s don't all look like each other,
> that doesn't necessarily mean they should be different heading levels. And
> designers are always going to come up with new designs, that may have
> things that don't look like the standard structural elements in HTML.3
>
> [1] https://www.mass.gov/find-your-future-commonwealth-job
> [2] https://www.mass.gov/find-your-future-commonwealth-job/resources
> Sarah E. Bourne
> Director of IT Accessibility
> Executive Office of Technology Services and Security (EOTSS)
> 1 Ashburton Place, 8th Floor, Boston, MA 02108
> Office: (617) 626-4502
> <EMAIL REMOVED> | www.mass.gov/eotss
> > > > >
--
Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator
Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired
1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756
voice 512.206.9315 <(512)%20206-9315> fax: 512.206.9452
<(512)%20206-9452> http://www.tsbvi.edu/
"We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964
- Next message: Angela French: "labeling sections"
- Previous message: Lovely, Brian: "Re: Few web accessibility related vialations:"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Bourne, Sarah (MASSIT): "Re: To what degree does failure to convey structure violate 1.3.1 or other success criteria?"
- View all messages in this Thread