E-mail List Archives
Re: "New" Accessibility Validator
From: Stephanie Sullivan
Date: Oct 24, 2003 8:48AM
- Next message: Kevin A Sesock: "Re: sales & spam"
- Previous message: Holly Marie: "Re: "New" Accessibility Validator"
- Next message in Thread: Holly Marie: "Re: "New" Accessibility Validator"
- Previous message in Thread: Holly Marie: "Re: "New" Accessibility Validator"
- View all messages in this Thread
on 10/24/03 10:34 AM, Holly Marie at <EMAIL REMOVED> profoundly spewed forth
their very articulate thoughts:
> Meeting section 508, to me, is not complete enough.
> All tests are not complete enough but the four sets of guidelines is
> better than just the one set to me.
> Cynthia Says does offer the options of all test checks, though since
> they imployed the more than one minute wait per domain, this can become
> an issue. It would be nice if Cynthia Says adopted an *all in one* test.
> Cynthia Says URL http://www.cynthiasays.com/
Holly, I agree that Section 508 is not enough.. But if you're talking about
the Hisoft validator, it's dropdown does 508 as well as WCAG I, II, & III...
And the interesting thing is, the report I received from Hisoft is identical
(even the formatting) as Cynthia Says... I'd say they're all just reselling
or repackaging "something"...
For what it's worth...
Contributing Author .: "Macromedia Dreamweaver MX 2004 Magic" :. New Riders
CommunityMX Team Member :: http://www.communitymx.com
Technical Editor .: "DreamweaverMX Killer Tips" :. New Riders
VioletSky Design :: http://www.violetsky.net t
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."
- Edmund Burke
To subscribe, unsubscribe, suspend, or view list archives,