E-mail List Archives
Re: Confirmation of actions - violation or feature?
From: Maxability A11Y
Date: Jul 18, 2018 8:41AM
- Next message: Steve Green: "Re: Interpretation of WCAG 1.4.13"
- Previous message: Maxability A11Y: "Re: aria-label issue with JAWS"
- Next message in Thread: Jonathan Cohn: "Re: Confirmation of actions - violation or feature?"
- Previous message in Thread: Mohith BP: "Re: Confirmation of actions - violation or feature?"
- View all messages in this Thread
Hi Ajay,
In many cases the content that is modified because of filters is after the
filter components and the user will navigate forward to read the filtered
content. The announcement of the alert that says filters applied is a best
practice as far as my knowledge is concerned. Anything that gets updated
before the initiating element in the content sequence can be considered
violation. Since this is a content change for the sequence I hope it is a
1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence success criteria.
As you said that the page is refreshed, consider checking the focus of the
screen reader after hitting the filter button. Chances that the screen
reader focus may jump to an arbitrary region on the page which may cause in
2.4.3 Focus order failure.
Hope this helps.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Mohith BP < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any clue for the non-screen reader users such as any change
> of color, shape such as arrow up / down etc.?
> then 1.1.1, 1.3.3 and / or 1.4.1.
>
> Are there other mechanisms such as remove filter which indirectly
> notifies the users that the filter has been applied?
>
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Mohith B. P.
>
> On 7/18/18, Ajay Sharma < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> > Hey All,
> >
> > Need your thoughts on this situation, would you consider it as
> > accessibility violation or a usability feature?
> >
> > Expected - Screen reader should confirm"Filters Applied" after user
> > hits "Apply" button after selecting the filters from the filters
> > dropdown.
> > Actual - Page refreshes when "Apply" button is clicked and screen
> > reader doesn't say anything.
> >
> > Although there is SC 4.1.3 Status Messages in WCAG 2.1 for it but we
> > do not follow it till now, the closest SC seems to be 1.23.1 Info and
> > Relationship.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Ajay
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >
- Next message: Steve Green: "Re: Interpretation of WCAG 1.4.13"
- Previous message: Maxability A11Y: "Re: aria-label issue with JAWS"
- Next message in Thread: Jonathan Cohn: "Re: Confirmation of actions - violation or feature?"
- Previous message in Thread: Mohith BP: "Re: Confirmation of actions - violation or feature?"
- View all messages in this Thread