E-mail List Archives
Re: Table with hidden first column
From: Isabel Holdsworth
Date: Nov 8, 2018 10:55PM
- Next message: Brandon Keith Biggs: "Re: data table pagination - focus position?"
- Previous message: Mohith BP: "Re: data table pagination - focus position?"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: R.U. Steinberg: "Re: Table with hidden first column"
- View all messages in this Thread
Glen's idea sounds like the best solution to me. Blind users will have
access to the record number if they need it, but the info isn't thrust
upon them. I wouldn't complicate things by using ARIA to hide any
content.
Cheers, Isabel
On 08/11/2018, R.U. Steinberg < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> Glen, thanks for the report. I will give it a try.
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 12:20 PM glen walker < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>
>> Interesting solution. I guess you have to go with whichever solution you
>> feel is the least worst. You don't really have a case where there is a
>> "best" solution. You just have to minimize the confusion and know there
>> will be negatives will all solutions.
>>
>> Neither NVDA nor VoiceOver will read the aria-label associated with your
>> <th>. With NVDA, it will feel like the first column is blank because
>> every
>> cell in the first column will be heard as blank. VO will not let me
>> navigate to the first column because (I'm guessing) it sees the entire
>> contents of the cell as aria-hidden.
>>
>> JAWS reads the aria-label so it sounds ok.
>>
>> In my case, with NVDA, I turned off the table coordinates announcement so
>> I
>> don't hear "row 1", "row 2", etc. I only like to hear the row or column
>> headers. With your solution, I don't hear any row headers as I navigate
>> vertically through a column (because they're aria-hidden), but perhaps
>> the
>> onus is on me because I changed my default configuration.
>>
>> I know your example code was just a sample, but in that case, I'd rather
>> have the name column used as the row headers. Have you thought about
>> doing
>> that in your real code? Don't make the row number cell the row header
>> but
>> use a column that has more meaning. A row header does not have to be the
>> first cell in the table row. That is, you can have:
>>
>> <tr>
>> <td>1</td>
>> <th scope="row">Gerard</th>
>> <td>Roseville, CA</td>
>> <td>The Godfather</td>
>> </tr>
>>
>> I think there is varying levels of support for row headers not being in
>> the
>> first column. I haven't tested it on all platforms lately, but sometimes
>> the row header is ignored on columns that come before the row header
>> column, but it works fine for all the columns after the row header
>> column.
>>
>> You'd still have the issue when the user is navigating vertically through
>> the first column where they'd hear "5" and "row 6", but it's only an
>> issue
>> when in that column. When they're in any other column, they'll hear the
>> name row header, the table cell value, and "row 5". They won't hear the
>> number you have in the first column.
>>
>> Glen
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 10:32 AM R.U. Steinberg <
>> <EMAIL REMOVED> >
>> wrote:
>>
>> > This was my workaround. We have a table where the first row is the
>> > header
>> > row and will be announced as row 1 to screen readers. When you get to
>> > the
>> > second row, it has a number 1 in front of it but will be announced as
>> > row
>> > 2. This is a confusing user experience when you have a table with say
>> > 100
>> > rows. A screen reader user shouldn't have to guess what row they are
>> > on.
>> >
>> > https://codepen.io/rusteinberg/pen/WYrogg
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> >> >> >>
> > > > >
- Next message: Brandon Keith Biggs: "Re: data table pagination - focus position?"
- Previous message: Mohith BP: "Re: data table pagination - focus position?"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: R.U. Steinberg: "Re: Table with hidden first column"
- View all messages in this Thread