E-mail List Archives
Is generated content reliably read by screen readers today?
From: Detlev Fischer
Date: Nov 23, 2018 2:47AM
- Next message: a.james@soton.ac.uk: "Re: Seeking best practice on heading & landmarks in single-page web apps"
- Previous message: glen walker: "Re: Seeking best practice on heading & landmarks in single-page web apps"
- Next message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: Is generated content reliably read by screen readers today?"
- Previous message in Thread: None
- View all messages in this Thread
Hi,
In 2013, there was a discussion here that stated that some browser /
Screenreader combinations did not reliably expose CSS-generated content
(via ::before). In the UA / SR combinations I have tried now, 5 years
later, CSS-generated text content was exposed and read. While I reckon
it is still not a recommended practice to use generated content on all
but decorative or supplemental information - is there still a case for
calling out such practice as WCAG failure?
Opinions?
Best, Detlev
--
Detlev Fischer
Testkreis
Werderstr. 34, 20144 Hamburg
Mobil +49 (0)157 57 57 57 45
http://www.testkreis.de
Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites
---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
- Next message: a.james@soton.ac.uk: "Re: Seeking best practice on heading & landmarks in single-page web apps"
- Previous message: glen walker: "Re: Seeking best practice on heading & landmarks in single-page web apps"
- Next message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: Is generated content reliably read by screen readers today?"
- Previous message in Thread: None
- View all messages in this Thread