E-mail List Archives
Re: Does role="combobox" eat the identity of nested elements?
From: Birkir R. Gunnarsson
Date: Sep 11, 2019 6:18AM
- Next message: Steve Green: "Re: Does role="combobox" eat the identity of nested elements?"
- Previous message: Steve Green: "Re: Does role="combobox" eat the identity of nested elements?"
- Next message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: Does role="combobox" eat the identity of nested elements?"
- Previous message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: Does role="combobox" eat the identity of nested elements?"
- View all messages in this Thread
I saw an interesting presentation from Matt King regarding the future
of the authoring Practices at CSUN last spring.
The idea was to ensure support by at least 1 (I think at least 2)
a.t./browser combos for every pattern.
There was an offshoot effort in the work to document desired and
actual assistive technology support for different patterns.
I haven't heard anything since, but these are exactly the types of
updates I want to see to the authoring practices.
I want people to be able to use the authoring practices patterns out
of the box and be sure that there is at least adequate assistive
technology support for that implementation.
On 9/11/19, Steve Green < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> They might have been accessible with the interaction modes that you used,
> but I guarantee they won't be accessible with all the different interaction
> modes that are possible.
>
> Steve
>
>
- Next message: Steve Green: "Re: Does role="combobox" eat the identity of nested elements?"
- Previous message: Steve Green: "Re: Does role="combobox" eat the identity of nested elements?"
- Next message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: Does role="combobox" eat the identity of nested elements?"
- Previous message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: Does role="combobox" eat the identity of nested elements?"
- View all messages in this Thread