E-mail List Archives
Re: WCAG SC 1.4.10 (Reflow) and sticky headers
From: Patrick H. Lauke
Date: Feb 24, 2020 2:52AM
- Next message: Steve Green: "Re: WCAG SC 1.4.10 (Reflow) and sticky headers"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Country maps best practise and examples."
- Next message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: WCAG SC 1.4.10 (Reflow) and sticky headers"
- Previous message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: WCAG SC 1.4.10 (Reflow) and sticky headers"
- View all messages in this Thread
On 24/02/2020 09:17, Steve Green wrote:
> The bit I am struggling with is that I didn't lose any content or functionality on the monitor that I was using for testing, which was 1280x1024px. I only lost content when I reduced the viewport height below 780px. I didn't need to do that, but of course other people might have monitors that are not that high.
>
> If we are going to say this is a non-compliance, it seems that the SC should specify the viewport height as well as the width. If we don't, then every sticky component is going to fail if you reduce the viewport height sufficiently.
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/987
(and yes, that SC is just very handwavy, unfortunately...as arguably it
had been rushed through at the time)
--
Patrick H. Lauke
https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
- Next message: Steve Green: "Re: WCAG SC 1.4.10 (Reflow) and sticky headers"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Country maps best practise and examples."
- Next message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: WCAG SC 1.4.10 (Reflow) and sticky headers"
- Previous message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: WCAG SC 1.4.10 (Reflow) and sticky headers"
- View all messages in this Thread