E-mail List Archives
Re: Regarding DIR
From: Jonathan Avila
Date: Jul 31, 2020 6:52AM
- Next message: Laura Fathauer: "Re: Accordion vs WCAG SCs"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Accordion vs WCAG SCs"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Mallory: "Re: Regarding DIR"
- View all messages in this Thread
I believe text direction issues would fall under success criteria 1.3.2.
Jon
Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
From: WebAIM-Forum < <EMAIL REMOVED> > on behalf of Mallory < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2020 5:07:24 AM
To: Gupta, Gaurav k via WebAIM-Forum < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Regarding DIR
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
I don't recall WCAG saying anything about dir attributes (if it does, it's surely in the language SCs), but whenever I see a rtl page or with rtl text, I check that they are using the attribute rather than relying on CSS. Using CSS alone to convey text direction may violate Meaningful Sequence, depending on what exactly is going on with the page.
With mixed-direction pages, I may look for bidi (<bdi>) tags especially in forms or places where users can input text.
cheers,
_mallory
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020, at 7:26 AM, Gupta, Gaurav k via WebAIM-Forum wrote:
> Hello Experts,
>
> Do we have any information related to DIR attribute(Direction) in WCAG.
>
> If so then how we should test?
>
>
> Regards
> Gaurav
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> This message w/attachments (message) is intended solely for the use of
> the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is
> privileged, confidential or proprietary. If you are not an intended
> recipient, please notify the sender, and then please delete and destroy
> all copies and attachments, and be advised that any review or
> dissemination of, or the taking of any action in reliance on, the
> information contained in or attached to this message is prohibited.
> Unless specifically indicated, this message is not an offer to sell or
> a solicitation of any investment products or other financial product or
> service, an official confirmation of any transaction, or an official
> statement of Sender. Subject to applicable law, Sender may intercept,
> monitor, review and retain e-communications (EC) traveling through its
> networks/systems and may produce any such EC to regulators, law
> enforcement, in litigation and as required by law.
> The laws of the country of each sender/recipient may impact the
> handling of EC, and EC may be archived, supervised and produced in
> countries other than the country in which you are located. This message
> cannot be guaranteed to be secure or free of errors or viruses.
> Attachments that are part of this EC may have additional important
> disclosures and disclaimers, which you should read. By messaging with
> Sender you consent to the foregoing.
> > > > >
- Next message: Laura Fathauer: "Re: Accordion vs WCAG SCs"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Accordion vs WCAG SCs"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Mallory: "Re: Regarding DIR"
- View all messages in this Thread