WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Re: Doubts regarding website logo

for

From: Vaibhav Saraf
Date: Aug 17, 2020 10:21AM


Thanks Bobby!

On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 at 21:15, bobby accessibility <
<EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:

> Dear Vaibhav,
>
> Choosing a logo as heading or H1 should not be a wise decision and it will
> break accessibility specially for UX..
>
> I will suggest following acceptance criteria for logo:
>
> 1. It should be announced with a graphic logo (link or button) I will
> prefer to announce this as a link
> 2. Exemptions for Color contrast for logo no need to worry if contrast
> ratio is below 4.5:1.
> 3.It should be consistent all across the application.as move with top
> navigation.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> cheers,
> Bobby
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 10:29 PM Vaibhav Saraf < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Patrick,
> >
> > Thanks for sharing your point of view.
> >
> > The logo is identified on all the pages as a link but one page where it
> is
> > a button. Yes it might not be right to classify it as a failure of
> > consistent identification but it is deviating from the standard use of a
> > button.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Vaibhav
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 at 02:16, Patrick H. Lauke < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On 15/08/2020 17:19, Vaibhav Saraf wrote:
> > > > Hi Everyone,
> > > >
> > > > I was auditing a website where on the login page they had programmed
> > the
> > > > logo to be a button and a heading level 1.
> > > >
> > > > On all other pages the logo was programmed as a button so I had
> failed
> > it
> > > > for coonsistent identification.
> > >
> > > Consistent identification wouldn't be quite the right SC in any case.
> > > It's more about consistently identifying (in text/name) the same
> > > control/functionality the same way across pages, not that there's some
> > > consistency (of roles or whatever) between similar controls on the same
> > > page.
> > >
> > > > But I had this particular doubt for treating the logo as a <h1>,
> after
> > > > login for a specific group the website redirects to one deployed on a
> > > > sub-domain, on all of the pages in the sub-domain the logo is marked
> as
> > > > <h1>.
> > >
> > > It's fine as long as it's consistent. Some folks like logos as <h1>s,
> > > others don't. What matters more is that it's predictable/implemented
> the
> > > same way across all pages, so once an AT user understands that that's
> > > the convention on that site, there's no further surprises for them.
> > >
> > > P
> > > --
> > > Patrick H. Lauke
> > >
> > > https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
> > > https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux
> > > twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >